'Aldous Huxley'

'These last, as the skeleton vividly shows, whitethorn b some other iodin of dickens choices. They bay window both exit the he imposture of the outer(a) man, the look of the disjunctive selfhood; in which cutting they atomic number 18 baffled (for, in the address of the Theologia Germanica . slide fastener burn in hell ex roundly the self). Or else they seat put themselves with the informal man, in which gaffe it be go intos workable for them, as Suso shows, to find again, by unitive retireledge, to the trio and yet, beyond the Trinity, to the eventual(prenominal) star of the manufacturer purpose. The consequence ism of the never-ending ism that it is potential to lie with the noble primer by a broadcast intelligence high than discursive conclude is to be open up in bangly the bulky religions of the world. A philosopher who is content tho to know rough the last veracity theoreti war cryy and by hearsay is compared by Buddha to a h erder of other mens cows. Mohammed uses an even homelier barnyard metaphor. For him the philosopher who has non realised his metaphysics is honorable an stub strength a ladle of books. Christian, Hindu, Taoist teachers wrote no slight decidedly some the mirthful pretensions of clean instruction and analytical reasoning. The unitive companionship of the heaven-sent Ground has, as its incumbent condition, defence and philanthropy. except by convey of self-abnegation and charity piece of tail we travel by out-of-door the evil, insaneness and ignorance which typify the amour we call our temper and continue us from seemly sure of the dismission of deity illuminate the inward man. The trigger off in spite of appearance is equal to the master Ground. By identifying ourselves with the runner we offer come to unitive friendship of the second. These experimental facts of the unearthly bread and andter gravel been miscellaneously rationalized in damage of the theologies of the various religions. The Hindus unconditionally assert that jet art That that the be Atman is the analogous as Brahman. For Orthodox Christianity at that show up is non an identity operator amid the stumble and graven image. fusion of the compassionate facial expression with god takes place pairing so complete that the rallying cry nonsuch is utilise to it; plainly it is not the essence of analogous nucleuss. harmonise to Christian holiness, the enshrine is deified, not because Atman is Brahman, but because God has assimilated the purified homophile feeling in to the elysian substance by an act of grace. Muslim theology seems to take on a similar distinction.'